Skip to main content

LLM & RAG Architecture Planning - Document Guide

Status: ✅ Planning Complete - No Code Changes
Date: October 9, 2025
Purpose: Navigation guide for architecture planning documents

📚 Document Overview​

This planning package contains comprehensive architecture analysis and enhancement plans for the LLM & RAG system. All documents are read-only planning with no code changes made.

🗂️ Document Structure​

1. 📋 EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md - START HERE​

Who: Stakeholders, decision-makers, project managers
Purpose: High-level business case and recommendations
Length: 10 pages
Read Time: 15 minutes

Contents:

  • Current state assessment
  • Recommended enhancements
  • Expected impact and ROI
  • Business case
  • Decision framework
  • Action plan

Key Takeaway: Approve Phase 1 (4 weeks) for 50-70% cost reduction and 40-50% latency improvement

2. 🏗️ LLM_RAG_ARCHITECTURE_PLAN.md - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN​

Who: Engineering team, architects, technical leads
Purpose: Complete technical analysis and roadmap
Length: 50+ pages
Read Time: 2-3 hours

Contents:

  • Current Architecture Inventory (20 pages)

    • Document processing
    • Retrieval systems
    • Reranking
    • Vector stores
    • LLM orchestration
    • Conversational AI
    • Caching & optimization
    • Evaluation & quality
    • Observability
    • Rate limiting

  • Gap Analysis (10 pages)

    • What's missing
    • Enhancement opportunities
    • Priority assessment

  • Enhancement Recommendations (15 pages)

    • 10 priority enhancements
    • Technical details
    • Implementation plans
    • Success metrics

  • Implementation Roadmap (5 pages)

    • 5-phase plan (28 weeks total)
    • Week-by-week breakdown
    • Resource allocation

Key Takeaway: Your current architecture is excellent; these enhancements will add 50-70% cost reduction and 20-30% quality improvement

3. 📊 LLM_RAG_LIBRARY_COMPARISON.md - LIBRARY SELECTION​

Who: Engineering team, technical decision-makers
Purpose: Detailed library evaluation and recommendations
Length: 30+ pages
Read Time: 1-2 hours

Contents:

  • Comparison Matrices (10 pages)

    • Multi-LLM abstraction layers
    • Advanced reranking libraries
    • Prompt engineering tools
    • Prompt compression
    • Semantic caching
    • Vector databases
    • Graph databases
    • Evaluation frameworks
    • Document processing
    • Multimodal processing

  • ROI Analysis (5 pages)

    • High ROI (immediate): LLMLingua, GPTCache, Multi-LLM
    • Medium ROI (near-term): RAGatouille, DSPy
    • Long-term ROI: Neo4j, CLIP/Whisper, PEFT

  • Detailed Library Analysis (10 pages)

    • Technical details
    • Integration points
    • Example code
    • Benchmarks

  • Implementation Checklist (5 pages)

    • Phase-by-phase tasks
    • Testing checklists

Key Takeaway: Use LangChain + LiteLLM for multi-LLM, RAGatouille for ColBERT, DSPy for prompts, LLMLingua for compression

4. 🚀 QUICK_START_INTEGRATION_GUIDE.md - IMPLEMENTATION​

Who: Engineers implementing the enhancements
Purpose: Copy-paste ready code for immediate implementation
Length: 40+ pages
Read Time: 3-4 hours (or reference as needed)

Contents:

  • Multi-LLM Support (8 pages)

    • Install commands
    • Configuration code
    • Provider factory implementation
    • Testing examples

  • Prompt Compression (6 pages)

    • LLMLingua integration
    • Compression module code
    • Pipeline integration
    • Testing scripts

  • Enhanced Caching (6 pages)

    • GPTCache setup
    • Hybrid cache implementation
    • Integration code

  • Query Routing (5 pages)

    • Semantic router setup
    • Route configuration
    • Integration code

  • ColBERT Reranking (8 pages)

    • RAGatouille integration
    • ColBERT reranker code
    • Multi-stage reranking

  • Benchmarking (5 pages)

    • Performance testing scripts
    • Metrics collection

Key Takeaway: Every enhancement has ready-to-use code examples - just copy, configure, and test

🎯 How to Use These Documents​

For Stakeholders / Decision Makers​

Read:

  1. ✅ EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md (15 minutes)

Action:

  1. Review business case and ROI
  2. Approve/reject Phase 1 implementation
  3. Schedule kickoff meeting

For Engineering Managers / Team Leads​

Read:

  1. ✅ EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md (15 minutes)
  2. ✅ LLM_RAG_ARCHITECTURE_PLAN.md - Focus on:
    • Current Architecture Inventory (know what you have)
    • Gap Analysis (understand what's missing)
    • Implementation Roadmap (plan resources)

Action:

  1. Assess team capacity
  2. Allocate resources
  3. Set up project tracking
  4. Plan sprints

For Engineers / Implementers​

Read:

  1. ✅ EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md (15 minutes) - Understand "why"
  2. ✅ LLM_RAG_LIBRARY_COMPARISON.md - Understand library choices
  3. ✅ QUICK_START_INTEGRATION_GUIDE.md - Implementation guide

Reference:

  • LLM_RAG_ARCHITECTURE_PLAN.md - For detailed context on any component

Action:

  1. Set up development environment
  2. Follow Quick Start Guide step-by-step
  3. Test each component
  4. Deploy to staging
  5. Monitor and iterate

For Architects / Technical Reviewers​

Read:

  1. ✅ All documents (3-4 hours total)

Review:

  • Technical accuracy
  • Integration points
  • Risk assessment
  • Scalability considerations

Action:

  1. Provide feedback
  2. Suggest alternatives
  3. Validate approach
  4. Approve architecture changes

📋 Quick Reference​

What Do We Have Now?​

✅ Excellent foundation:

  • Hybrid retrieval (BM25 + embeddings + reranking)
  • 5 vector stores (OpenSearch, MongoDB, Qdrant, Azure, Vertex)
  • RAGAS evaluation
  • A/B testing
  • Rate limiting
  • Observability (LangSmith, Prometheus, Jaeger)
  • Semantic caching
  • Multiple production use cases

What Are We Adding?​

🆕 Phase 1 (Weeks 1-4):

  • Multi-LLM support (OpenAI + Anthropic + Google)
  • Prompt compression (40-60% cost reduction)
  • Enhanced caching (GPTCache)
  • Query routing

🆕 Phase 2 (Weeks 5-8):

  • ColBERT reranking (15-20% quality improvement)
  • DSPy prompt optimization (systematic engineering)

🆕 Phase 3 (Weeks 9+):

  • Graph RAG (Neo4j)
  • Multimodal RAG (CLIP, Whisper)
  • Model fine-tuning (PEFT, LoRA)

Expected Results​

After Phase 1 (4 weeks):

  • 💰 Cost: -50% to -70%
  • ⚡ Latency: -40% to -50%
  • 🔧 Flexibility: 3 LLM providers

After Phase 2 (8 weeks):

  • 📊 Quality: +20% to +30%
  • 🛠️ Systematic prompt engineering

After Phase 3 (20 weeks):

  • 🆕 Graph relationships
  • 🆕 Multimodal support (images, audio)
  • 🎯 Fine-tuned domain models

🔍 Finding Specific Information​

"How much will this cost?"​

See: EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md → Business Case

Answer: $20-30K engineering time, $60-90K annual savings = 2-3x ROI

"What libraries should we use?"​

See: LLM_RAG_LIBRARY_COMPARISON.md → Recommended Library Stack

Answer:

  • Multi-LLM: langchain-anthropic, langchain-google-genai, litellm
  • Compression: llmlingua
  • Caching: gptcache
  • Reranking: ragatouille
  • Prompts: dspy-ai

"How do I implement multi-LLM support?"​

See: QUICK_START_INTEGRATION_GUIDE.md → Multi-LLM Support Integration

Answer: Step-by-step guide with code examples (8 pages)

"What's the current architecture?"​

See: LLM_RAG_ARCHITECTURE_PLAN.md → Current Architecture Inventory

Answer: Comprehensive inventory of all components (20 pages)

"What are the risks?"​

See: EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md → Risk Mitigation

Answer: Technical and business risks with mitigation strategies

"How long will this take?"​

See: LLM_RAG_ARCHITECTURE_PLAN.md → Implementation Roadmap

Answer:

  • Phase 1: 4 weeks (high priority)
  • Phase 2: 4 weeks (quality improvements)
  • Phase 3: 12 weeks (advanced features)
  • Total: 20 weeks for complete implementation

✅ Action Items by Role​

Stakeholder / Decision Maker​

  • Read EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md
  • Review business case and ROI
  • Make go/no-go decision on Phase 1
  • Schedule kickoff meeting if approved

Engineering Manager​

  • Read EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md
  • Skim LLM_RAG_ARCHITECTURE_PLAN.md (focus on roadmap)
  • Assess team capacity
  • Allocate 1 senior engineer for 4 weeks
  • Set up project tracking
  • Define success metrics

Technical Lead / Architect​

  • Read all documents
  • Review technical approach
  • Validate library choices
  • Identify integration risks
  • Provide feedback and approval
  • Plan technical reviews

Engineer (Implementer)​

  • Read EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md (understand why)
  • Read QUICK_START_INTEGRATION_GUIDE.md
  • Set up development environment
  • Follow implementation guide
  • Test each component
  • Document any issues
  • Deploy to staging

📞 Questions & Support​

Common Questions​

Q: Do I need to read all documents?
A: No! See "How to Use These Documents" above for your role.

Q: Can I start implementing now?
A: No - these are planning documents. Wait for stakeholder approval.

Q: What if I find an issue or have a suggestion?
A: Document it and discuss in the review meeting.

Q: Are these libraries battle-tested?
A: Yes - see library comparison document for community adoption and maturity.

Q: What if a library doesn't work?
A: All recommendations include fallback options and migration paths.

🎓 Learning Path​

Week 1 (Planning Phase)​

Day 1-2: Read EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md
Day 3-4: Skim LLM_RAG_ARCHITECTURE_PLAN.md
Day 5: Team discussion and Q&A

Week 2 (If Approved - Pre-Implementation)​

Day 1: Set up development environment
Day 2-3: Read QUICK_START_INTEGRATION_GUIDE.md
Day 4: Read LLM_RAG_LIBRARY_COMPARISON.md
Day 5: Technical deep dive with team

Week 3+ (Implementation)​

Follow the Quick Start Integration Guide step-by-step

📊 Document Statistics​

DocumentPagesRead TimeTarget AudiencePurpose
EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md1015 minAllDecision making
LLM_RAG_ARCHITECTURE_PLAN.md50+2-3 hrsTechnicalComprehensive plan
LLM_RAG_LIBRARY_COMPARISON.md30+1-2 hrsTechnicalLibrary selection
QUICK_START_INTEGRATION_GUIDE.md40+3-4 hrsEngineersImplementation
Total130+6-10 hrsComplete package

🎯 Success Criteria​

Planning Phase Success​

  • All stakeholders have reviewed EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md
  • Engineering team understands the approach
  • Decision made on Phase 1 approval
  • Resources allocated
  • Timeline agreed upon

Implementation Phase Success​

  • Environment set up successfully
  • Each component tested independently
  • Integration testing passed
  • Performance benchmarks met
  • Deployed to staging
  • Ready for production rollout

📝 Version History​

VersionDateChangesAuthor
1.0Oct 9, 2025Initial planning packageAI Architecture Team

🔖 Quick Links​

Status: ✅ Complete
Ready for: Stakeholder Review
Next Step: Schedule review meeting

💡 Pro Tips​

  1. Don't try to read everything at once - Use this guide to find what you need
  2. Start with EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md - It's the fastest way to understand the plan
  3. Bookmark this README - Use it as your navigation hub
  4. Share selectively - Each role needs different documents
  5. Ask questions early - Better to clarify during planning than during implementation

Need Help? Refer to the "Finding Specific Information" section above or reach out to the architecture team.